Case ID: 242
Publication date: 05 Jun, 2015
Consensus grade: GS 9-10 (ISUP 5)
Show diagnosis by expert panel members| User | Diagnosis | Difficulty | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pathologist 1 | GS 9-10 (ISUP 5) | Typical |
4+5 |
| Pathologist 2 | GS 9-10 (ISUP 5) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 3 | GS 9-10 (ISUP 5) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 4 | GS 9-10 (ISUP 5) | Borderline higher |
v. 448 |
| Pathologist 5 | GS 4+4=8 (ISUP 4) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 6 | GS 4+3=7 (ISUP 3) | Borderline lower |
always difficult these cases, I would go for a 4+3, because still have the impression to see some glands |
| Pathologist 7 | GS 4+3=7 (ISUP 3) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 8 | GS 9-10 (ISUP 5) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 9 | GS 4+4=8 (ISUP 4) | Borderline lower | |
| Pathologist 10 | GS 9-10 (ISUP 5) | Borderline lower |
?4+4 |
| Pathologist 11 | GS 9-10 (ISUP 5) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 12 | GS 4+4=8 (ISUP 4) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 13 | GS 9-10 (ISUP 5) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 14 | GS 9-10 (ISUP 5) | Borderline lower | |
| Pathologist 15 | GS 9-10 (ISUP 5) | Borderline lower | |
| Pathologist 16 | GS 9-10 (ISUP 5) | Borderline higher |
Gleason score 4 + 5 |
| Pathologist 17 | GS 4+4=8 (ISUP 4) | Borderline lower |
Mainly poorly formed or fused glands. Some apparent poorly formed glands could be tangentially cut 3 |
| Pathologist 18 | GS 4+3=7 (ISUP 3) | Borderline higher | |
| Pathologist 19 | GS 9-10 (ISUP 5) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 20 | GS 9-10 (ISUP 5) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 21 | GS 9-10 (ISUP 5) | Borderline higher | |
| Pathologist 22 | GS 9-10 (ISUP 5) | Borderline higher | |
| Pathologist 23 | GS 4+4=8 (ISUP 4) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 24 | GS 9-10 (ISUP 5) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 25 | GS 9-10 (ISUP 5) | Typical |
Case description (by case creator):
4+5=9 where the GP5 component infiltrates diffusely in strands and single cells.
