Case ID: 628
Publication date: 27 Aug, 2015
Consensus grade: GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1)
Show diagnosis by expert panel members| User | Diagnosis | Difficulty | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pathologist 1 | GS 3+4=7 (ISUP 2) | Borderline lower | |
| Pathologist 2 | GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) | Borderline higher | |
| Pathologist 3 | GS 3+4=7 (ISUP 2) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 4 | GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 5 | GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 6 | GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) | Borderline lower |
Easy 3 |
| Pathologist 7 | GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) | Typical |
Focus of HPIN also noted. |
| Pathologist 8 | GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 9 | GS 3+4=7 (ISUP 2) | Borderline lower |
The slight complexity of the mucinous fibroplasia is leading me to diagnose a minor GP4 component. |
| Pathologist 10 | GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) | Typical |
predominantly discrete glands |
| Pathologist 11 | GS 3+4=7 (ISUP 2) | Borderline lower |
Small cribriform element. therefore must be pattern 4 as per Chicago 2014 consensus recomendations |
| Pathologist 12 | GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 13 | GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) | Typical |
Some mucinous fibroplasia present. |
| Pathologist 14 | GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) | Borderline higher | |
| Pathologist 15 | GS 3+4=7 (ISUP 2) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 16 | GS 3+4=7 (ISUP 2) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 17 | GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) | Borderline higher |
Mucnous fibroplasia |
| Pathologist 18 | GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) | Borderline higher | |
| Pathologist 19 | GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 20 | GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) | Typical |
Maybe on the right one focus of IDC or PIN, not easy to say, would make a comment, or do IHC |
| Pathologist 21 | GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) | Typical | |
| Pathologist 22 | GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) | Borderline higher | |
| Pathologist 23 | GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) | Typical |
Case description (by case creator):
Well-formed cancer glands that infiltrate among benign glands. There are some collagenous micronodules but the adjacent glands do not seem to be disrupted.
