Case ID: 554

Publication date: 27 Aug, 2015

Consensus grade: GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1)

User Diagnosis Difficulty Comment
Pathologist 1 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical

I would never call this 3 + 4

Pathologist 2 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 3 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 4 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 5 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 6 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 7 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Borderline lower
Pathologist 8 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 9 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 10 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Borderline higher
Pathologist 11 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical

typical discrete glands

Pathologist 12 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 13 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 14 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 15 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Borderline higher

Can't exclude tangential sectioning for the glands without an open lumen, therefore default to 3+3=6.

Pathologist 16 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 17 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Borderline lower
Pathologist 18 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 19 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 20 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 21 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical

sme beginning confluent aspects, but would leave it on 3

Pathologist 22 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 23 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 24 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical


Case description (by case creator):

A couple of groups of well-formed glands with a few structures that most likely are tangential cuts.