Case ID: 480

Publication date: 27 Aug, 2015

Consensus grade: GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1)

User Diagnosis Difficulty Comment
Pathologist 1 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Borderline higher
Pathologist 2 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 3 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 4 GS 3+4=7 (ISUP 2) Borderline lower
Pathologist 5 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 6 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 7 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Borderline lower

All separate glands, a few irregular in shape but not fused

Pathologist 8 GS 3+4=7 (ISUP 2) Typical
Pathologist 9 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Borderline higher
Pathologist 10 GS 3+4=7 (ISUP 2) Borderline higher

Approx. 5% pattern 4.

Pathologist 11 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical

mostly discrete glands

Pathologist 12 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 13 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 14 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 15 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 16 GS 3+4=7 (ISUP 2) Typical
Pathologist 17 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 18 GS 3+4=7 (ISUP 2) Typical
Pathologist 19 GS 3+4=7 (ISUP 2) Typical
Pathologist 20 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical

would leave it in 6, although some confluent aspects exist

Pathologist 21 GS 3+4=7 (ISUP 2) Borderline lower
Pathologist 22 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Borderline higher
Pathologist 23 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 24 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical


Case description (by case creator):

Only GP3. A few seemingly poorly formed glands may be tangential cuts or compressed glands. Some branching is acceptable in GP3.