Case ID: 255

Publication date: 05 Jun, 2015

Consensus grade: GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1)

User Diagnosis Difficulty Comment
Pathologist 1 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Borderline lower
Pathologist 2 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 3 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 4 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical

well formed glands, good to distinguish

Pathologist 5 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 6 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 7 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Borderline lower
Pathologist 8 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 9 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 10 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 11 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 12 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 13 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 14 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 15 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 16 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 17 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical

Not enough convincing gland fusion for pattern 4.

Pathologist 18 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical

All well-formed separate glands

Pathologist 19 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 20 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 21 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 22 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 23 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 24 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical
Pathologist 25 GS 3+3=6 (ISUP 1) Typical


Case description (by case creator):

Classical 336 case. Pale staining glands that would probably have been reported as GS 4 or 5 by some in the earlier years.